Planning with Life Insurance and Annuities
Thursday, April 26th, 2007Along with exemptions for homestead and retirement plans, state law exemptions for life insurance and annuities are often valuable tools for asset protection planning. Because the asset protection planning undertaken by most estate planners and asset protection planners involves clients with substantial assets, we are primarily concerned with the protection of the cash value of life insurance and annuities. The federal bankruptcy exemption for life insurance cash value is $10,775 where the insured is the debtor or a person on whom the debtor is dependent (including the debtor’s spouse).
About a third of U.S. jurisdictions have low-value or no exemption for life insurance cash value. Other jurisdictions have exemptions that provide substantial protection. The exemption statutes of some jurisdictions, such as Florida, Hawaii, Arizona, and Texas, make it clear that the cash value of a life insurance policy or annuity contract owned by a debtor is protected from claims of the debtor’s creditors. The statutes of many others, unfortunately, are hardly models of clear drafting. The confusion is precipitated by the fact that there are a number of roles a person can play with regard to a life insurance policy or annuity contract. The debtor might be (1) the owner; (2) the insured; or (3) the beneficiary. Furthermore, many, though not all, exemptions for life insurance and annuities are predicated on protection of a favored class, generally spouses and dependents. Finally, just what are the interests in an insurance policy or annuity contract that are to be exempted? The clause “proceeds and avails” appears in the exemption statutes of many jurisdictions. In some states, this clause is defined to include cash surrender values and loan values. In the statutes of many states, “proceeds and avails” and similar terms are undefined in the statutes. Therefore, it is left to the courts to decide what is exempted by the statute. Courts in some jurisdictions have found that such vague exemption statutes cover cash surrender value (see, e.g., In re Worthington, 28 B.R. 736 (Bankr. W.D. Ky 1983); In re Gablehart, 138 B.R. 425 (Bankr. D. Vt. 1992)), others have found that they do not (see, e.g., In re Monahan, 171 B.R. 710 (Bankr. D. N.H. 1994)). Others have added additional twists in construing the often tortured language of insurance exemption statutes (see, e.g., In re Sloss, 279 B.R. 6 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2002) (cash value is protected from owner’s creditors for the benefit of the original beneficiary; if the beneficiary has been changed since the policy was effected, the exemption does not apply)).
State law exemptions for annuities vary widely as well. Some jurisdictions, such as North Carolina and Rhode Island, provide no exemption, while others, such as Florida and Arizona, provide exemptions for payments and cash values. Many others provide some exemption for monthly annuity payments, generally in relatively small amounts ($350 per month is common).
Life insurance and annuities can be valuable planning tools, but planners must be intimately familiar with applicable exemption statutes and the case law interpreting those statutes.